Archive for October, 2009

Book Review: Skinny Bitch October 28th, 2009

Skinny Bitch by Rory Freedman and Kim Barnouin
A no-nonsense, tough-love guide for savvy girls who want to stop eating crap and start looking fabulous!

books

This is the book that changed my life.  Literally.  I went veg after reading it.  The book focuses healthy eating, but the part that got me was the chapter on animal abuse in our factory farms…

Included in the book are direct quotes from factory farm workers talking about what they’d seen or what they themselves had done to the animals and it just sickened me to my core. Malicious and torturous acts of cruelty to the animals that were more than unnecessary, they were flat-out evil.  Through my bawling, I knew that I never wanted to contribute to this kind of pain, suffering, and hatred ever again.  It still makes me so angry, even makes my stomach queasy, just thinking about the huge amount of cruelty and suffering that is involved for just one meal.  (I’m not even talking about the act of killing the animals here; I’m talking about malicious brutality to the animals while alive.)

Written in an in-your-face tone, (”Don’t even try some pathetic excuse… No one wants to hear it.”) you learn not only about the cruelty, filthiness, and unhealthiness of meat, but it also discusses things like sugar, carbs, and dairy, as well as touches on corruption in our food regulation agencies (USDA, FDA).  Plus, there is a listing of healthy, vegetarian meal ideas for breakfast, lunch, and dinner for an entire month!

This is not just a book for chicks. Obviously, it is marketed towards women, but the information is definitely unisex.  Plus, it’s such a short & easy read that it’s certainly worth the small amount of your time.

Five stars (out of five).
____________________
Breakfast: Bagel with jelly
Lunch: General Tso’s Bean Curd (tofu)
Dinner: A big salad with lots of stuff: spinach, tomato, cucumber, celery, chick peas, avocado, kidney beans, peas, corn, carrots, broccoli, and pine nuts


 

Ending World Hunger October 27th, 2009

Food expert Francis Moore Lappe, author of Diet for a Small Planet, once said that we should look at a piece of steak like it is a Cadillac.  “What I mean,” she explains, “is that we in America are hooked on gas-guzzling automobiles because of the illusion of cheap petroleum.  Likewise,we got hooked on a grain-fed, meat-centered diet because of the illusion of cheap grain.”

In reality, the process of using grain to produce meat is incredibly inefficient and wasteful.  To produce just one pound of beef requires 161 pounds of grain and 5,214 gallons of water!  John Robbins, author & activist, says, “You may save more water by not eating a pound of beef than you would by not showering for six entire months.”  But, this is not a post about water (for that, check out this post: Meat’s Not Green: Water).  This is a post about hunger.

Over 90% of all grain (corn, wheat, etc) produced in America is used to feed livestock.  If this grain were used to feed humans instead, the planet could easily support a human population of 20 billion or more.  (PS – We’re at 6 billion now.)  Because of this fact, experts often point out that the world hunger problem is illusory.  Currently, we are producing enough food for everyone on the planet – we are simply allocating it inefficiently.

The United Nations Food Conference says, “The over-consumption of meat by the rich means hunger for the poor.  This wasteful agriculture must be changed – by the suppression of feedlots where beef are fattened on grains, and even a massive reduction of beef cattle.”

Plus, an acre of grain actually produces, on average, five times more protein than an acre of pasture used for meat! An acre of beans or peas produces 10 times more protein, and an acre of spinach produces 28 times more protein than an acre used for meat.

The wasteful process of meat production, which requires far more land & water resources than vegetable agriculture, has been a source of economic conflict in human society for thousands of years, even as far back as ancient Greece.  In Plato’s Republic, the Greek philosopher Socrates recommended a vegetarian diet because it was the most efficient use of their land.  He warned that if people started eating animals, there would be a need for more pasturing land.  “And the country which was enough to support the original inhabitants will be too small now, and not enough… And so we shall go to war.” 

In the current era, much of the world’s mass conflict is fueled by food shortages.  As far back as 1974, the CIA published a report warning that in the near future, there may not be enough food for the world’s population “unless the affluent nations make a quick and drastic cut in their consumption of grain-fed animals.”

Meat-eating in industrialized nations is certainly linked to world hunger.  According to one study, if Americans reduced their meat consumption by just 10% (approximately 1 meatless day per week), 12 million tons of grain would be freed up annually for human consumption – enough to feed each of the 60 million children & adults who starve to death each year.

Awareness of the social consequences of meat consumption creates an ethical imperative to work towards a vegetarian diet.  The only reason to consume meat is a selfish one. 
___________________
Breakfast: Oatmeal
Lunch: Spinach burrito from California Tortilla (no cheese, no sour cream)
Dinner: Veggie pizza made with soy cheese

Related Posts:


 

Meatless Monday #6: Veggie/Vegan Pizza October 26th, 2009

It’s pretty easy to make a veggie pizza.  I make mine vegan by using soy cheese.  I also tried Smart Deli’s “pepperoni” slices for the first time.  I thought they were pretty tasty!  Just like pepperoni, but minus all the grease, fat, and cruelty.

smartdelipepperoni

This picture is terrible because my camera is broken, so I took this with my cell phone.  It’s a Boboli crust with sauce, Veggie Shreds (soy cheese), Smart Deli “pepperoni”, and green olives.

IMG00023

Related Posts:


 

The Hidden Cost of Meat October 24th, 2009

The meat industry is a powerful economic & political force. Besides spending million of its own dollars to promote meat-eating, it has also secured an unfair share of our tax dollars.  Because the the meat production process is so wasteful, inefficient, and costly, the industry must be subsidized to survive.  Most people are unaware of how heavily our federal government supports the meat industry with grants, favorable loan guarantees, and purchases of its surplus products, which are often just destroyed.

Just one example is the  National School Lunch Program, started in 2003.  The program was created with two official purposes: To provide healthy meals to children regardless of income, and to subsidize agribusiness by “shoring up demand for beef”.

The Federal Government purchases more than $800 million worth of mostly meat & dairy products for the National School Lunch Program annually and although it is supposed to purchase ALL farm products, it tends to purchase in direct response to lobbying.  In 2001, the USDA spent $350 million on surplus beef & other meat products for schools – more than double what was spent on fruits & vegetables (most of which were canned or frozen).

Jennifer Raymond, a school nutritionist who has worked with many schools to develop healthier menus, states, ”Basically, it’s a welfare program for suppliers… It’s a price support program for agricultural producers, and the schools are simply a way to get rid of the items that have been purchased.”  By the way, the money to run this ”welfare program” comes out of our tax dollars. 

Plus, because of unhealthy, meat-centric school meals, our society is now battling such previously rare problems as childhood obesity, and Type II diabetes.

And speaking of our tax dollars, more tax dollars go down the drain in the form of millions the US spends on the little-publicized problem of animal diseases. When diseased animals are destroyed, the our government pays the owners an indemnity. A New York Times article called this subsidy “outrageous,” characterizing it as “a scandalous steal out of the public treasury.”  No other industry gets paid for their tainted goods!  Yep, outrageous.
____________________
Breakfast: Waffle-fest at work yesterday! 
Lunch: Mac & cheese, salad, and an orange
Dinner: Wild mushrooms (shitake, portobello, enoki and white mushrooms), bean sprouts, and tofu sautéed with soy-garlic sauce


 

Meatless Monday #5: My Favorite Things Salad October 19th, 2009

This is a simple, but delicious salad that includes all of my favorite things:
Artichoke Hearts
Hearts of Palm
Green Olives
Black Olives
Tomato
Freah Basil (straight from my balcony)
Olive Oil & Balsamic Vinegar

food 003

Related Posts:


 

Pesticide Facts October 16th, 2009

According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Academy of Sciences standard chemicals are up to ten times more toxic to children than to adults, depending on body weight.  This is due to the fact that children take in  more toxic chemicals relative to body weight than adults and have developing organ systems that are more vulnerable and less able to detoxify such chemicals.  According to the EPA’s “Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment,” children receive fifty percent of their lifetime cancer risks in the first two years of life.

According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), half of produce currently tested in grocery stores contains measurable residues of pesticides.  Laboratory tests of eight industry leader baby food reveal the presence of 16 pesticides, including three carcinogens.  In blood samples of children aged 2-4, concentrations of pesticide residues are six times higher in children eating conventionally farmed produce compared to those eating organic food.

According to the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), organophospahte pesticides (OP) are now found in the blood of 95% of Americans tested.  OP levels are twice as high in blood samples taken from children than in adults.  Exposure to OP is linked to hyperactivity, behavior disorders, learning disabilities, developmental delays, and motor dysfunction.  OPs account for half of the insecticides used in the US. 

The US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) reports that one of the main sources of pesticide exposure for US children comes from the food they eat.

The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) strictly prohibits mixing different types of pesticides for disposal due to the well-known process of the individual chemicals combining into new, highly toxic chemical compounds.  There are no regulations regarding pesticide mixture on a consumer product level even though, in a similar manner, those same individual pesticide residues interact and mix together into new chemical compounds when conventional multiple ingredient products are made.  Sixty-two percent of food products tested contain a measurable mixture of residues of at least three different pesticides.

Currently, more than 400 chemicals can be regularly used in conventional farming as biocides to kill weeds and insects.  For example, apples can be sprayed up to 16 times with 36 different pesticides.  None of these chemicals are present in organic foods.

More than 300 synthetic food additives are allowed by the FDA in conventional foods.  None of these is allowed in foods that are USDA certified organic.

____________________
Breakfast: Cereal & soy milk
Lunch: Grilled veggie sandwich with bell peppers, onion, mushrooms, zucchini, and tomoato
Dinner: Veggie stir-fry, lo-mein, and veggie egg roll

Related Posts:


 

Meatless Monday #4: Tofu Scramble October 12th, 2009

This one is super easy!
Just crumble 1 block of extra firm tofu into a pan (I have to admit, it’s pretty fun to squish with your hands)! Add 1 teaspoon of turmeric and anything you would add to scrambled eggs. I added soy cheese & bacon bits (most bacon bits are fake bacon – just check to make sure you’re getting those, not real bacon). Try veggies like spinach, bell peppers, onion, mushroom, etc. Heat until warm and that’s it! So easy.


___________________
This post is in support of the Meatless Monday campaign.

Related Posts:


 

Burgers That Can Shatter Lives October 9th, 2009

Last week, the New York Times published an in-depth article on how the flaws in our industrialized meat system can lead to devastating consequences, including death.  It features the story of one woman who was paralyzed from the waist down by an E. coli contaminated hamburger.

“I ask myself every day, ‘Why me?’ and ‘Why from a hamburger?’ ”Ms. Smith said. In the simplest terms, she ran out of luck in a food-safety game of chance whose rules and risks are not widely known.

In 1994, an outbreak of E. coli spread through Jack & The Box hamburgers left 4 children dead.  Yet, the food safety standards have not changed.  Tens of thousands of people are still sickened annually by tainted meat. 

“I’ve had women tell me that E. coli is more painful than childbirth,” said Dr. Phillip I. Tarr, a pathogen expert at Washington University in St. Louis.

Eating ground beef is a gamble

Neither the meat safety system, nor the meat itself, is what we have been led to believe.

Ground beef is NOT simply a chunk of meat run through a grinder!  Instead, a single portion of hamburger includes not only various grades of meat from various parts of a cow, but also from various cows, and even various slaughterhouses.  Plus, low-grade ingredients are cut from areas of the cow that are more likely to have come in contact with feces, which spreads E. coli.

For example, the hamburger that left Ms. Smith paralyzed was labeled “American Chef’s Selection Angus Beef Patties,” but the confidential griding logs (tracked down during the investigation to determine what made her sick) show that the hamburgers were made from a mix of slaughterhouse trimmings and a mash-like product derived from scraps that were ground together.  The ingredients for this hamburger came from slaughterhouses in Wisconsin, Nebraska, Texas, South Dakota, and Uruguay.  All in one single burger. 

But here’s the real kicker: There is no federal requirement for grinders to test their ingredients for E. coli.  The USDA allow grinders to devise their own safety plans, most of which do not include testing the meat for E. coli prior to grinding.  In fact, there are even large slaughterhouses that will sell only to grinders who agree not to test their meat!

Inside the slaughterhouses, contamination can happen at any step.  First of all, the cows come in covered in feedlot feces (again, feces is what spreads E. coli).  The hides must be very carefully removed to ensure that none of that feces touches the meat.  This is especially difficult for trimmings (you know, the stuff that’s ground up in hamburgers), which are sliced from the outer surface of the carcass. 

At the gutting station, where the intestines are removed, it is common for the intestines to spill, splattering the ground, the table, or even on to meat, with feces.  (Ever seen the movie Fast Food Nation?)

And, if at any point one cutter’s knife comes in contact with the bacteria, they can spread it down the line to numerous pieces of meat.

In one plant inspection, inspectors had found “large amounts of patties on the floor,” grinders that were gnarly with old bits of meat, and a worker who routinely dumped inedible meat on the floor (where those “large amounts of patties” are sitting).  Unsanitary conditions like these only spread bacteria more.

It’s all about the Benjamins, baby

How in the world can these corrupt and dangerous practices be allowed?  Unfortunately, the USDA is operating under a conflicted goal: To ensure consumer safety, and to promote the agricultural industry.  Since the majority of the USDA’s upper management comes from the agriculture industry, they protect their own. 

Using a combination of sources (a practice followed by most hamburger producers) costs about 25% less than it would to use whole cuts of meat. And of course, recalls are a HUGE detriment to profits, so avoiding recalls is a major goal, and naturally, avoiding inspections is one way of avoiding recalls.

Dr. Kenneth Petersen, an assistant administrator with the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service, said that the department could mandate testing, but that it needed to consider the impact on companies as well as consumers. “I have to look at the entire industry, not just what is best for public health,” Dr. Petersen said.

 Prevention?

Food scientists have registered increasing concern about the virulence of this pathogen since only a few stray cells can make someone sick, and they warn that federal guidance to cook meat thoroughly and to wash up afterward is not sufficient. A test by The Times found that the safe handling instructions are not enough to prevent the bacteria from spreading in the kitchen.

“Ground beef is not a completely safe product,” said Dr. Jeffrey Bender, a food safety expert at the University of Minnesota. He said that while outbreaks had been on the decline, “unfortunately it looks like we are going a bit in the opposite direction.”

“In a warm kitchen, E. coli cells will double every 45 minutes,” said Dr. Mansour Samadpour, a microbiologist.  With help from his laboratories, The Times prepared three pounds of ground beef dosed with a strain of E. coli. Although the safety instructions on the package were followed, E. coli remained on the cutting board even after it was washed with soap. A towel picked up large amounts of bacteria from the meat.

Dr. James Marsden, a meat safety expert at Kansas State University, said the Department of Agriculture needed to issue better guidance on avoiding cross-contamination, like urging people to use bleach to sterilize cutting boards. “Even if you are a scientist, much less a housewife with a child, it’s very difficult,” Dr. Marsden said.

New York Times article: E. Coli Path Shows Flaws in Beef Inspection

 See also my posts on tainted meat & USDA regulations.

____________________
Breakfast: Oatmeal
Lunch: Healthy Choice frozen meal with pumpkin ravioli (new seasonal item, I guess)
Dinner: Tofu scramble breakfast taco (with fakin’ bacon bits, soy cheese, and salsa)

Related Posts:


 

Religion (Yes, I’m Going There) October 6th, 2009

God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” Genesis 1:28

Why is it that we turn to religious teachings for moral guidance in so many aspects of our lives, yet so seldom in the matter of eating animals?  It is time we inspected this original sanction to “subdue the earth,” both in letter and spirit.

Humans have the unique ability, unparalleled in the natural world, to know God and to attain His transcendent purpose.  Because of this, most people regard animals as secondary beings, as morally incidental, soulless beings for whom no bell ever tolls, and to whom we have no moral duties.

However, we can not deny that under religious principle, we have a basic obligation of kindness.  Religion teaches us to spread our care as far and as wide as possible, to be His instrument in loving all creation.  

So, it is easy for us to condemn those who abuse dogs, poach elephants, or hunt dolphins.  But why do we not condemn ourselves for eating cows, chickens, or pigs?  (And more so, for fueling the torturous practices and massive slaughterings that lead them to our plate?) 

Because we like dogs, elephants, and dolphins.  We honor their dog-ness, their elephant-ness, or their dolphin-ness.   What I mean by this is, we see them for what they are, for how God created them.  We allow them to be how they were meant to be and we appreciate their intelligence, beauty, wildness, or loyalty.  We respect them for their natural, God-given characteristics.

Livestock on the other hand, we dominate.  We strip away their natural rights, their natural habitats, their ability to be what they are meant to be, their cow-ness, pig-ness, chicken-ness.  We do not look at them as He created them, instead we look at them as our own design for them.  We strip away our ability to respect them as creatures of God, as equivalent to the dolphin, elephant, or dog.

How naive we are to assume that God cares more for a dog than for a cow!  Why do we think that He only cares for animals that meet with human kindness, but not for those that meet with human cruelty?  It is ignorant to believe that God cares more for certain creatures, just because we do. 

Every creature is one of His creations.  Every life has a meaning, whether or not that meaning is understood by us. 

“Go into the largest livestock operation, search out the darkest and tiniest stall or pen, single out the filthiest, most forlorn little lamb or pig or calf, and that is one of God’s creatures you’re looking at, morally indistinguishable from  your beloved Fluffy or Frisky.”- Matthew Scully

While, yes it is true that God told man to “subdue the earth” and “rule the animals,” it is obvious that fallen man is abusing his powers.  As we are taught in other contexts, His ways are not our ways.  As one old hymn tells us, there is a wideness in God’s mercy greater than the mind of men.  So, who among us has the divine wisdom to be certain that His mercy does not include the cows, pigs, or chickens? 

Here, more than anywhere, is a chance to learn a lesson in humility and demonstrate our efforts to mimic God’s compassion.  For, what are we to Him, but what they are to us?

Now, I’m no theologian and I definitely don’t claim to exemplify any pillars of any religion, but I am betting that in the Book of Life, “She had mercy on the creatures” is going to count for a lot more than, “She ate well.”

____________________
Breakfast: A scone
Lunch: Leftover Mongolian BBQ (lots of veggies + tofu)
Dinner: Corn, asparagus & baby carrots (mixed together & steamed), and potaoes & onions (chopped up & cooked in some olive oil)

Related Posts:


 

Meatless Monday #3: Mac & Not Cheese October 5th, 2009

Disclaimer: I typically stick with very easy meals that take 10 minutes or less and don’t require ingredients I’ve never heard of or will never use again.  However, this Mac & Not Cheese is so worth the time and crazy ingredients that I will surely use again, making this dish over and over.

In a food processor, blend:
1/2 onion (I cook mine in a pan quickly first, to bring out the cooked flavor)
1/2 cup cashews
3/4 cup water
3 tablespoons lemon juice
1/4 teaspoon salt
2 oz. roasted red peppers (1/2 of a 4 oz. jar)
1 teaspoon garlic powder
1 teaspoon onion powder
1 1/2 tablespoons nutritional yeast – This is NOT regular yeast! If your grocery store does not have it, check Whole Foods or a nutrition suppliment store.

Pour the mixture over cooked pasta and bake in the over at 425 for 20 minutes.

Ok, so it’s not going to taste exactly like cheese, so don’t expect it to.  But, it does taste good and it’s healthy and humane!

 Mac & Not Cheese
____________________
This post is in support of the Meatless Monday campaign.

Related Posts: